Replies

Can you show me where in the 14th amendment is says that I have the right NOT to obey the laws of this land? And it IS the law, whether you know it or agree with it, that we have to submit to IRS audits. You do. I do. Larry Klayman does.

Until that law is changed, you can THINK all you want to, it's still the law.

Since the audit is being continued AFTER Clinton left office, it is obviously not politically motivated.

If Bush intervened, THAT would be politically motivated, wouldn't it?

Tough luck, Larry. My sister got audited. My dad was audited twice. Why do you think you are better than my dad or sister? What do you have to hide?

Where is all that money coming from? My bet is Hillary and Terry McAuliffe.

Like I said before, the IRS needs to be abolished. You tell me where the 14th Amendment says it is legal for a bureaucratic entity to pick and choose who to audit without any proof of criminal wrongdoing and without any publically published guidelines that say who gets audited and who doesn't. If the IRS audits Judicial Watch, this would be a glaring example of Unequal Protection Under the Law. Since when does a bureaucratic organization have the ability to pick and choose whoever they want to audit, without giving us some publically published guideline on how they do this? Howlin, whether you like it or not, this is not a correct application of the law.

Like I said before, the IRS is an undemocratic institution in that it is not accountable to the American people at all. You are using bad logic by assuming that I believe the 14th Amendment says that we shouldn't have to obey the law; I did not say or mean this. The intent of the law however, should be greatly scrutinized and questioned, especially when entities such as the IRS hide behind the law as an exuse to use gestapo tactics to silence political organization's free speech.