[Howlin]

In January, 1999, an IRS official admitted to Judicial Watch representatives, in the context of the propriety of the audit, “What do you expect when you sue the President?” Another IRS official admitted in June, 1999, that the political affiliations of Judicial Watch’s directors is a factor in any IRS audit.

There seems to be some information missing there, doesn't it? Likes names. Seems like if that was true, he'd print who said it.

[deport]

Heck the 'eWW' has only four directors and three of them are employees of JW. Now that wouldn't be considered ethical in any publically held corporation. But for the 'eWW' that is pure ethics.... sheesh.

The four directors and their salaries per the 2000 form 990 filing.....

Larry E Klayman.....$250,000+
Paul J Orfandes...... $155,214+
Thomas Fitton.... $128,646+
John Marnua..... $0.....

Heck it used to be that Judicial Watch even paid his law firm Klayman and Associates over $300,000 for rent and supplies, etc. Ethics where art thou..... Now it's reversed and Klayman and Associates is paying "fair value" to JW for the same....

Heck if they are above board and nothing wrong then an audit shouldn't be feared.... it would only boast their claim of being the "eWW"....