Replies

To FreedominJesusChrist: You might say that you "personally believe" that Ron Brown was murdered, but you also say (in fact you insist) that you don't know what you're talking about and that I should call Judicial Watch for details. That dishonest tactic is called diversion.

And what do they call the tactic of claiming that JW called the death a suicide when he never has?

And as far as "personal belief" goes, I'm more than willing to argue the facts in the Brown case. Why pick on FreedominJesusChrist? She never has claimed an intimate knowledge of the circumstance surrounding the Brown death. But I do.

I posted a few of the facts in the Brown case a few posts back. Let's see if you have the guts to try and dispute them, or will you just RUN like democRAT move-on'ers ALWAYS do. Let's see if you have anything "clever" to say about the facts in the articles at Newsmax.com on the Brown case. Let's see if you have anything "witty" to say about the x-ray of Brown's head that pathologist after pathologist say indicate a bullet wound. Bet you can't name one who doesn't ... unless you'd like to argue the credibility of Dickerson.

We also know that Judicial Watch has never come out and publically stated that Ron Brown was murdered.

Gee. Maybe because he's honest unlike you. He simply asked for an autopsy which would show whether or not Brown was shot in the head. Dare I say "diversion" on your part?

Tell the truth for once: Why doesn't Judicial Watch want the American people to know the truth about Ron Brown's "mysterious death"?

And I suppose you call this an "honest" debating tactic? Well all I can do is say thanks, again, for showing up and keeping the Ron Brown discussion alive ... and proving that yet another Klayman detractor dishonestly discusses the subject. Now let's see if you run from the statements of the pathologists too.

As I understand it, you call Ron Brown's death a "murder," your partner doesn't have enough "intimate" knowledge to have an opinion, Judicial Watch doesn't have a present opinion, and you call me a liar for calling it a suicide. Which of the many facts that you've listed rule out suicide?

And, more importantly, why shouldn't Judicial Watch disclose all that has been requested so that we can learn more about all this?