Replies

Have you seen anything where the IRS has requested that the 'eWW' make the list public? I've only seen info that they have requested the info be supplied to them.

That's all I've seen. As a matter of fact, to the best of my knowledge the only information the IRS makes public in audits would be in the case of criminal charges; i.e., we wouldn't even know they were trying to audit JW if JW hadn't told us so.

Do you have any idea why it would be necessary for 'eWW' to protect the list with his life from the IRS?

One has to wonder who - or what - might be on that donor list. Big politicos? Clinton's rivals, either Democratic or Republican? Foreign donors? Foreign governments? Who knows? The IRS must be on the trail of something....My "most-likely" guess would be that someone has claimed they gave large sums to JW and JW hasn't claimed receiving those sums, but I'm just guessing here.

Wouldn't you think 'eWW' would like to get on with the mission of ferreting out gov't corruption, conducting his cruises, filing the FOIA request, doing some Amicus briefs and in general getting back to fund raising?

I really would think so, unless they think these threats of disclosing identities might make people donate even more, to "protect their privacy"......

Thanks.. I know that the 501c3 regs doesn't require 'eWW' to release the names to the public when the public request info about the organizations finances..... But I don't understand what 'eWW' is basing the refusal to provide the IRS with documentation of the organization's income. Heck he claims so much in contributions and the donors have taken tax deductions in many cases, I'd assume. It's like us having to provide documentation for our deductions/income/etc.

GO AUDIT GO.. get on with the mission of ferreting out gov't abuse
dem Bones gonna rise again