[ned]

I don't claim to know everything about the 4th Amendment, but I do know a little bit about it. If the government were to force Judicial Watch to disclose their donor list, how would this not be a violation of both Judicial Watch's and the donor's 4th Amendment Rights?

Because there simply is no constitutional right of privacy connected with the payment of money. The Fourth Amendment protects us from unreasonable searches and seizures and it has nothing to do with covering up the existence of transactions like the payment of money.

Larry Klayman and Judicial Watch need to come clean with the American people. The cover-up must end.

And I don't take Mr. Klayman's suicide threat ("over my dead body") seriously. I think that he would flee the country before he would take his own life.

Don't you?

[FreedominJesusChrist]

So why do banks not give out financial information about their clients to the public?

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Why are medical records not made public to anyone who wants them? You need to understand that the 4th Amendment had been interpreted more broadly than what you are interpreting it as.

[Iwo Jima]

>I think that he would flee the country before he would take his own life.

Exactly. Like to a villa in Italy???

Larry can be expected to exit when things get hot enough and the jig is up. Few who know him will will be surprised. He seems to have made contingency plans for the inevitable time when the con game crashes.