Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ned
You are twisting people's words. I personally believe that Ron Brown was murdered. We know that Judicial Watch was and probably still is suspicious of his death. We also know that Judicial Watch has never come out and publically stated that Ron Brown was murdered. They haven't changed their tune and you have shown no documentation to proove otherwise.

Judicial Watch will not post the names of their donors because no law is requiring them to do so. If the IRS ever tries to force Judicial Watch to make public their donor list, the IRS would be violating the donor's 4th Amendment privacy rights, because the donors would not have done anything wrong that would warrant the Federal Government to have the Probable Cause necessary to invade their zone of privacy. This would be grounds for a class action lawsuit on the grounds that the donor's 4th Amendment rights were infringed upon.

1,833 posted on 05/02/2002 2:27:16 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1832 | View Replies ]


To: FreedominJesusChrist
You are twisting people's words. I personally believe that Ron Brown was murdered.

You might say that you "personally believe" that Ron Brown was murdered, but you also say (in fact you insist) that you don't know what you're talking about and that I should call Judicial Watch for details. That dishonest tactic is called diversion.

We know that Judicial Watch was and probably still is suspicious of his death. We also know that Judicial Watch has never come out and publically stated that Ron Brown was murdered. They haven't changed their tune and you have shown no documentation to proove otherwise.

And by your own admission, if I were to call Judicial Watch for details, I would learn that they have never called Ron Brown's death a murder. So your clever diversion is not only dishonest, but dilatory as well.

Judicial Watch will not post the names of their donors because no law is requiring them to do so. If the IRS ever tries to force Judicial Watch to make public their donor list, the IRS would be violating the donor's 4th Amendment privacy rights, because the donors would not have done anything wrong that would warrant the Federal Government to have the Probable Cause necessary to invade their zone of privacy. This would be grounds for a class action lawsuit on the grounds that the donor's 4th Amendment rights were infringed upon.

You have much to learn about the Fourth Amendment. There is nothing in that amendment which forbids one citizen from disclosing the identities of persons who provide him with money. I should think that just reading the amendment would tell you that much. The only amendment which would prevent the Government from forcing Mr. Klayman to come clean with the American people is the Fifth Amendment.

Is that what it call comes down to here? Is Judicial Watch going to take the Fifth?

Tell the truth for once: Why doesn't Judicial Watch want the American people to know the truth about Ron Brown's "mysterious death"?

1,834 posted on 05/02/2002 2:42:30 PM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1833 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson