[ned]

Of course I take the Ron Brown murder very seriously. Who wouldn't? With no autopsy performed and a reported bullet hole in his skull, I have every right and reason to be suspicious.

Don't you think we all have a right to be suspicious? Judicial Watch changes its story about Ron Brown's "demise" and Judicial Watch is now burying the names of its contributors.

Why don't you think that the American people deserve the truth?

BTW, are you claiming that the "bullet hole" is an entrance wound rather than an exit wound?

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"Don't you think we all have a right to be suspicious? Judicial Watch changes its story about Ron Brown's "demise" and Judicial Watch is now burying the names of its contributors. Why don't you think that the American people deserve the truth? BTW, are you claiming that the "bullet hole" is an entrance wound rather than an exit wound?"

Judicial Watch has never changed their story about Ron Brown's demise. I do not believe that they have ever claimed that he was actually murdered; I do know that they were always and still are suspicious about his death. Unless you can provide documentation showing that they have changed their stories, I will not believe you.

What is this about Judicial Watch now burying the names of their contributors? They have never made the names of their contributors public!