So now it's "very likely murdered, period", is it? So much for the murder case.
That's all that I've been trying to tell you. Klayman and Judicial Watch have changed their tune about the "demise" of Ron Brown. Today's "version" of the truth is not the same as yesterday's "version." They don't want to associate the word murder with his death now that Judicial Watch may have to disclose the identity of its contributors.
Has Judicial Watch destroyed all of its correspondence with the House Judiciary Committee?
Where do the rights of the American people fit into your your view of the necessity for concealment and obfuscation?
As for your other questions, I am not the proper person to ask. Why don't you give them a phone call yourself? That is, if you really wish to know the truth.
Now, I'd like to get back to the question of why you called Brown's death a suicide. Do you have a theory? Can you cite any other sources ... even one ... that supports your claim? If not, why did you make the claim ... just to DISHONESTLY disrupt?
That's all that I've been trying to tell you. Klayman and Judicial Watch have changed their tune about the "demise" of Ron Brown.
Untrue. Klayman has never stated that he thinks operatives of Clinton murdered Brown (although his legal actions may bring that possibility to mind). And Klayman has never suggested it was a suicide as you dishonestly tried to suggest. You still sticking to that lie?