They must be protected because there is no law requiring Judicial Watch to disclose the names of their supporters. Judicial Watch respects the privacy of their donors. Forcing Judicial Watch to disclose the names of their donors to the public would be a blatant privacy violation against their Constitutional Rights.
But all I'm saying is no one has asked that the names be disclosed to the public as you assert above....
- Forcing Judicial Watch to disclose the names of their donors to the public would be a blatant privacy violation against their Constitutional Rights.
Yes it would be but no one not even the IRS has asked for that so why are you spinning it that way. Apples/Oranges to the request submitted by the IRS and you know it.
I never said that the IRS had requested for disclosure of their donor list. I was stating the what if's. In my post #1800, I stated:
" I would like to see the Federal Government even try to force Judicial Watch to release the names of their donors to the public. I am just envisioning a hugely beautiful class action lawsuit right now."See, I never stated that they had, I stated that it doesn't sound far fetched to me. The IRS is shameless in their techniques that invade American citizen's privacy, not to mention that they aren't even a constitutional entity.