[ned]

Because - hoping any new FR readers who just logged on this week... will find this thread/and find out about all the great patriotic work JudicialWatch performs

What is Judicial Watch's latest version of the truth regarding Ron Brown's suicide?

What Judicial Watch contributors must be protected at any cost?

[BeAChooser]

Whose idea was it that the House Judiciary Committee should not hear public testimony regarding Ron Brown's suicide

What is Judicial Watch's latest version of the truth regarding Ron Brown's suicide ?

So Ned ... are you deliberately trying to make a fool of yourself?

You do know, don't you, that you are the FIRST to allege this was a suicide. That makes you sort of "special", doesn't it?

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"What Judicial Watch contributors must be protected at any cost?"

They must be protected because there is no law requiring Judicial Watch to disclose the names of their supporters. Judicial Watch respects the privacy of their donors. Forcing Judicial Watch to disclose the names of their donors to the public would be a blatant privacy violation against their Constitutional Rights. If this happens, I believe that Judicial Watch would file a civil lawsuit on the behalf of their donors, for a violation of their 4th Amendment privacy rights.