I also feel that you and deport need to realize that this audit is about more than just Larry Klayman or Judicial Watch, it is about whether or not we are going to allow the IRS to audit individuals and organizations out of pure political motivation.
It may also be a scare tactic to push-around the little people who donate to Judicial Watch. I don't care though, my check still goes to Judicial Watch. Because WE need them!!! And they need us to do their job!!
One would have to be either blind or completely stupid to not get that impression from your posts. I think that you need to be more patient with Larry Klayman and Judicial Watch, that's all.
Freedom, you missed my point entirely. If I dislike someone, it's generally not out of the blue - most of the time I have some problems with their philosophy, morals, tactics, etc.
For example, a certain poster on this thread who follows people around, mischaracterizes what they say, and criticizes them for not commenting on subjects that are beyond the subject matter of the thread - that sort of thing gets on my nerves. The immorality of the Clintons bothers me. Especially around April, anything concerning the IRS bothers me, but if I've paid everything I owe, those other people better have too, know what I mean?
I also feel that you and deport need to realize that this audit is about more than just Larry Klayman or Judicial Watch, it is about whether or not we are going to allow the IRS to audit individuals and organizations out of pure political motivation.
This is assuming that Larry is correct, and the audit is solely politically motivated.
Is it possible that the article deport found is correct, and financial irregularities might be a factor?