Is that about it?
No ...
It is claiming you know about the Ron Brown matter when you don't which makes one a liar. It is claiming you have sources that convince you Brown wasn't murdered then not being able to name even one of those sources that makes you a liar. It is telling us that the source is Ken Starr when Ken Starr was never involved in the Brown case that makes one a liar. And it is claiming to have witnessed me being put under "the table" in a discussion about Brown with Howlin and not being able to even cite one URL or quote one exchange where that happened that makes you a liar.
Now is the concept sufficiently clear?
Yes, thank you.
I don't believe that Ron Brown was shot or murdered. I believe that he died as a result of injuries received in the plane crash. I do not have anything to base that opinion on, other than contemporary news reports and what I have read here on FR.
Am I a liar?
(Hint...this is a test.)