[Howlin]

What I am quoting is information out on the internet; just as YOU quote it in your contortions. We don't all get all our "news" from Larry Klayman's fax machine. There are other sides to the story, unless you're now going to contend that everybody in the world is a liar except Larry Klayman.

As I said before, if it was a lie, why isn't Larry suing? BTW, that's from a letter sent to John Conyers and Henry Hyde.

[BeAChooser]

What I am quoting is information out on the internet;

Oh you must know your credibility is in trouble now ... having to defend Slate and the Washington Post as reliable sources.

The difference between your sources and mine are a chasm. In the Brown case, for example, my sources are all verifiable. You can go listen to interviews with people like Janowski that verify everything in the articles written by Ruddy and others. How can we verify anything you have to say about the Brown case when all you use are unnamed "sources"? And I've shown that the Washington Post LIED about some of the facts in the Brown matter and failed to publish the rest of the facts. I doubt SLATE did any better (you are welcome to prove me wrong). Your sources are demonstrably unreliable and BIASED.