JUDICIAL WATCH FIGHTS CLINTON IRS ATTEMPTED AUDIT

Judicial Watch ^ | April 18, 2002

[ChaseR]

"Boy, is my face red!"

...as usual - Bttt

[ChaseR]

"I do not want politically motivated audits to be allowed..."

Ditto/Bttt

[ChaseR]

Bttt

[BeAChooser]

Unless Klayman is part of the cover-up, he can tell you about what he learned about at least one of the impeachment managers and why the Ron Brown suicide can no longer be used for fundraising purposes.

Thank you. You just demonstrated that you know absolutely nothing about the Ron Brown case.

Nothing more need be said about your post.

[ChaseR]

Bttt

[ChaseR]

Bttt

[hattend]

Why'd you ping me to a thread that has degenerated into nothing but "group whine" nonsense?

Just curious.

[ChaseR]

Because - hoping any new FR readers who just logged on this week...
will find this thread/and find out about all the great patriotic work JudicialWatch performs. - Bttt

[Fred Mertz]

Hey man, where have you been? I told FiJC via FReepmail that I thought you were given a temporary time out. Good to see you again!

[ned]

Nothing more need be said about your post.

What is it about my mention of the impeachment managers and their correspondence with Judicial Watch that makes you want to "move on" all of a sudden? Whose idea was it that the House Judiciary Committee should not hear public testimony regarding Ron Brown's suicide during its impeachment hearings?

Once again, if you work for Larry Klayman, why aren't you telling people all that you at Judicial Watch know about the suicide? Who is Judicial Watch really covering up for? And why?

[ned]

Because - hoping any new FR readers who just logged on this week... will find this thread/and find out about all the great patriotic work JudicialWatch performs

What is Judicial Watch's latest version of the truth regarding Ron Brown's suicide?

What Judicial Watch contributors must be protected at any cost?

[FreedominJesusChrist]

I know, I really missed having ChaseR around. So good to have you back.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

I don't think that Judicial Watch employees comment on these threads.

[BeAChooser]

Whose idea was it that the House Judiciary Committee should not hear public testimony regarding Ron Brown's suicide

What is Judicial Watch's latest version of the truth regarding Ron Brown's suicide ?

So Ned ... are you deliberately trying to make a fool of yourself?

You do know, don't you, that you are the FIRST to allege this was a suicide. That makes you sort of "special", doesn't it?

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"What Judicial Watch contributors must be protected at any cost?"

They must be protected because there is no law requiring Judicial Watch to disclose the names of their supporters. Judicial Watch respects the privacy of their donors. Forcing Judicial Watch to disclose the names of their donors to the public would be a blatant privacy violation against their Constitutional Rights. If this happens, I believe that Judicial Watch would file a civil lawsuit on the behalf of their donors, for a violation of their 4th Amendment privacy rights.

[Baseballguy]

What is there it hide if it is political. What either party does is for politics anyway. Who cares? Let them fight amungst eachother.

[Baseballguy]

You sound like a Methodist like our George W. Bush.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

I cannot reply properly to a post that is completely incoherent.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

I am not Methodist, I am Missouri-Synod Lutheran.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

I would like to see the Federal Government even try to force Judicial Watch to release the names of their donors to the public. I am just envisioning a hugely beautiful class action lawsuit right now.