"Wilson found she could not pursue criminal charges against the voyeur because secret video taping, unlike audio surveillance, is illegal in only a handful of states." Personally, find this incredible that it would even be considered 'legal'. . .is this not a form of theft? Could this not be considered a kind of 'terrorism'?
To place a camera in someone anothers domain, and literally steal their life and then pass it around - for profit yet - is the sleaziest, most disgusting venture that only someone lower than swampgrass could consider. . .
Do not know why this would be considered legal. . .it is as immoral as theft; and is more like the crime of rape. . .
This would also make illegal a husband leaving a video camera running in the bedroom to see what the wifey is up to while he's at work
Passing around a hidden video "for profit" would be a commercial venture. Without a release, the peeped person could sue.
If a camera were hidden in your house by someone outside of your house, would you not be able to prosecute for illegal entry?