Basically, I suspect Danger has pulled some shit somewhere and wants off the hook by forbidding any criticism of men whatsoever that might open up possibilities of criticism. That's usually what these arguments boil down to. As I have said, contemporary women have been dead wrong about many thing. So have men. Until they BOTH, that's BOTH, shape up, we're going to continue having a lot of problems in this society, including a 1/3 illigitimacy rate and a 50% divorce rate, and generations of rootless children. Now Danger wants to blame it entirely on women and keep his illusion of his perfection intact. Liberated women want to blame it entirely on men so they can escape blame and responsibility. Consequently anything I say in the way of truth elicits temper tantrums and accusations, and even borderlin psychotic reactions from both sides. Consequently, I have a breed of women screaming at me from one side on this and other threads saying I'm purely on the side of men --and a breed of men screaming at me like little girls on the other side claiming I'm purely on the side of women. --spoiled brats all. Their arguments become progressively distorted as they are cornered.
Heh heh heh... So much so that women voted for those guys in unprecedentedly high proportions and are - in fact - responsible as a group for their electoral successes.
Another stellar example of high moral principle and award winning academic prowess... Somebody around here is pulling on something, that's for sure.