There is no such implication. I merely stated what happened. I advocated no prior restraint on lobbyists of any sort.
On the other hand, I do not believe we are required to roll over and play dead every time our political opponents win one on Capitol Hill. Hell, that happens every day. The set of ideological Marxists is much larger than the set of feminist ideological Marxists. We have environmentalist Marxists who ultimately want to take us back to collective agriculture powered by the Sun; globalist Marxists who want us to pay taxes to the UN so they can do to developing countries what Marxists have already done to Russia and Eastern Europe; we have almost every kind except economic Marxists. We used to have those, too, but then the Marxist economies imploded, putting lie to the idea that Marxism has any value as an economic theory. But that doesn't stop people from advocating it as an ideal. As Gorbachev said, "Communism is a beautiful-sounding idea. But it does not work."
So anyway, what we have in this case is a bunch of academic Marxists who managed to lobby their way into having a gigantic bureaucracy with lots of federal money and authority over the education system. They now use this to implement their vision of a utopian gynocratic socialism in which men are basically uneducated worker bees who are kept off in the corner somewhere so that the lesbians running this effort could actually get to be in charge.
I think parents of sons need to have their antennas out for this phenomenon, and if it's happening in their school, they need to get their sons out of there. The people running that show do not have their sons' education as a goal. Their real agenda is more at emotionally and intellectually crippling him so that he can't compete. That's not really anything a sane person would want for their child.