Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RLK
What you are telling me is that the series is a desperate attempt to get sex over the internet.

I went out of my way to state in advance that my comments applied to Section 10, and Section 10 alone.

I also went out of my way to state that I did not mean that you, personally and literally, wrote the piece to get sex over the Internet. I said you were probably too old to give a damn about that, but were instead operating from habit or instinct.

Denials aside, what you wrote is an example of yer basic Emm-One-Five-One Attempt To Get Laid, once each, O.D. green. It's the one where the knight in shining armor arrives to warn the ladies that men are monsters, but that he -- the White Knight -- is here to spill the beans on those awful men and protect womanhood from their predations. It would be interesting to hear from any ladies in the house as to just how old they were when they first heard that one.

    The information appearing there has been reviewed by reputable psychoanalysts and other clinicians with positive results.

Are you telling us that your political tracts are reviewed by mental health professionals before they get posted to the Internet? I had no idea Orlinn Grabbe was that careful. You'd never know it by looking at the stuff he has there.


136 posted on 04/20/2002 5:58:12 PM PDT by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: Nick Danger
I went out of my way to state in advance that my comments applied to Section 10, and Section 10 alone.

------------

What I suggest is that you study the work in its entirity and its integration into the whole rather than read a few sentences and rush back here eager to spout off.

Might I also suggest your insistance that I am operating from hypothetical habit or instinct that is convenient for purposes of your argument is quite presumptous. You have no idea what my habits are or ever have been. Your attempts to to be a psychiatrist suggest you shouldn't quit your daytime job.

Zola doesn't have my work reviewed by othere. I do. As far as what other people or quality of work he has there at the sites I write for, I am not responsible and frequently don't even know about it. I often don read the issues that come out unless I have articles in them. I have no interest in some of the other views that are written there just as I have no interest in many of the people or views that occur at this site. To be frank, some of what I see here is disgusting. The same is true elsewhere.

146 posted on 04/20/2002 11:07:18 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson