Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re
"Sex" isn't speech. Period. I believe the Founding Fathers had something a little different in mind than sexual "intercourse" or "oral" sex.
204 posted on 04/17/2002 6:22:27 PM PDT by joathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: joathome
You're a fast reader. I like that - reminds me of me ;)

"Sex" isn't speech. Period.

So if I draw a picture of two imaginary people having sex, who is having sex, really? Where's the sex in that case?

I believe the Founding Fathers had something a little different in mind than sexual "intercourse" or "oral" sex.

Probably. They probably didn't envision "Car and Driver" either, but that's the nice thing about the universal principles they laid out for us - we can apply them to things they couldn't possibly imagine or predict.

207 posted on 04/17/2002 6:29:17 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson