Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tai_Chung
What is considered a "child" in this article? Is it teenagers or are they talking about pre-teens?

-------------------------

At some point is there really that much difference? Hands off the kids.

8 posted on 04/16/2002 12:49:25 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: RLK
"At some point is there really that much difference? Hands off the kids."

Actually, there IS that much of a difference. Because the behaviors are diffferent. The pedo is attracted to kids who are not sexually self-aware (or sexually sentient). Once puberty hits, the pedo has no further interest and moves on. The OTHER behavior is the perversion of being attracted to dramatically younger but nonetheless sexually sentient partners - i.e., fully-developed but underaged teen girls.

What has caused the perversion in the language is the legislative insistence that every person even one day younger than 18 is a "child." This leads to situations where a nude photo of a girl aged 17 years 364 days is "child porn" and the same photo of the same girl taken 24 hours later is "legal erotica." Whenever arbitririness enters into the picture, lines of behavior get blurred and linguistic precision goes out the window.

Michael

15 posted on 04/16/2002 1:05:25 PM PDT by Wright is right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson