Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Houmatt
Oh, please. You almost sound a kiddy porn defender. Is that the impression you wish to give?

If no child was used in its production, then I most certainly do wish to defend the right to publish and read kiddie porn.

There is a very good reason why the Bill of Rights reads the way it does. Congress is not to get into the business of deciding what are allowed ideas, feeling, or speech. This is not a slippery slope, it is simply an abrupt end of freedom of speech. How would you like it if a humanist democratic congress decided that worshipping God as your religious commitments dictate is obscene? This is not a far-fetched example, it is vengefully historical.

542 posted on 04/19/2002 11:22:44 AM PDT by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies ]


To: donh
If no child was used in its production, then I most certainly do wish to defend the right to publish and read kiddie porn.

This tells me everything I need to know about you and your attitude.

549 posted on 04/19/2002 3:16:13 PM PDT by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson