This interpretation stood until post-WWI when the SC evidently became so enlightened we started down the road to legalized "virtual child porn". I can't belive the republic survived for 150 years without it.
And what happens if/when a majority of people in this country decide that carrying a picture of an aborted fetus is "destructive to the ends of society"? Or that evangelizing for your preferred religion is "destructive"? To what principle will you appeal then?
You are talking about unleashing forces that you cannot possibly hope to control...
What part of "congress shall make no law" do you think requires me to look elsewhere for extensive analysis?