[jwalsh07]

Simple economics: Use a real kid and go to jail. Use a virtual kid a you're ok.

The laws of economics do not much matter to pedophiles, of whom we were talking about, the laws of perversity is their guide.

Until this ruling a pornographer would go to jail either way. So why not use a real kid. Now the scumbags have a reason not to. Simple.

The scumbags remain scumbags whether or not drugs, kiddie porn or murder are declared legal. That is something that some folk have a hard time getting their hands around.

Now I'll ask again, does advertising and widely disseminating information on a "product" result in less use of that "product"? What do the economic laws tell you there?

[bvw]

My limited familiarity with the business tells me that pornographers are very much economically driven. Would that more big businesses be so attached to their cash flow rather than financial gimmicks and credit lines.

That's why I'm sure as all get out that this ruling will save some kids.

[bvw]

Hey what happened to New Coke?