To: Slyfox
On the same note, George W. Bush was totally within his right to address a grievence and have a court rule in the matter. It is no different in this case. It is not the same thing. Bush never took a vow of obedience. Your Priest did and no matter how much you people want him to stay on he should obey his bishop and leave.
24 posted on
04/16/2002 9:34:48 AM PDT by
pgkdan
To: pgkdan
A vow of obedience does not include cowtowing to the the feminist working in the chancery office. Father has never attended the feminazi-led training sessions designed to turn men into wimps and for that reason he is having his face dragged through the mud. This has nothing to do with disobedience. This is payback for being a priest who listens to the Pope. He has a legitimate case that is being looked at right now by top Canon lawyers.
29 posted on
04/16/2002 10:06:40 AM PDT by
Slyfox
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson