Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Slyfox
On the same note, George W. Bush was totally within his right to address a grievence and have a court rule in the matter. It is no different in this case.

It is not the same thing. Bush never took a vow of obedience. Your Priest did and no matter how much you people want him to stay on he should obey his bishop and leave.

24 posted on 04/16/2002 9:34:48 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: pgkdan
A vow of obedience does not include cowtowing to the the feminist working in the chancery office. Father has never attended the feminazi-led training sessions designed to turn men into wimps and for that reason he is having his face dragged through the mud. This has nothing to do with disobedience. This is payback for being a priest who listens to the Pope. He has a legitimate case that is being looked at right now by top Canon lawyers.
29 posted on 04/16/2002 10:06:40 AM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson