Skip to comments.
Medieval Black Death Was Probably Not Bubonic Plague
Science Daily ^
| Posted 4/15/2002
| Penn State
Posted on 04/15/2002 11:36:11 AM PDT by Gladwin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Evolution in action
1
posted on
04/15/2002 11:36:11 AM PDT
by
Gladwin
To: *crevo_list
I am a little curious what they think could be the Black Death, if it wasn't bubonic plague.
It is too bad that they couldn't sample dead bodies from that time period for bacterial genetic material. I don't know if that is even possible.
2
posted on
04/15/2002 11:40:40 AM PDT
by
Gladwin
To: Gladwin
...not the modern disease known as the bubonic plague...Uh, duh. It could have been a different strain of the bubonic plague. It could have included a bunch of different diseases that were lumped in with bubonic plague. I hope these folks have got an infectious disease specialist or two on their team.
3
posted on
04/15/2002 11:43:11 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: Gladwin
This article was posted a few days ago, and anyway, I think it's bunk. As though rats couldn't find a way to get across rivers. These scientists need to take a trip into the real world.
To: Gladwin
"You know, medicine is not an exact science, but we are learning all the time. Why, just fifty years ago they thought a disease like your daughter's was caused by demonic possession or witchcraft. But nowadays, we know that Isabelle is suffering from an imbalance of bodily humors, perhaps caused by a toad or a small dwarf living in her stomach."
--Theodoric of York
To: SpringheelJack
And bone up on the lifestyles of the furry and flea-infested.
6
posted on
04/15/2002 11:47:09 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: Gladwin
To: KarlInOhio
"You know, medicine is not an exact science..."
"Broom Gilda - more leaches..."
8
posted on
04/15/2002 11:49:41 AM PDT
by
Psalm 73
To: Gladwin
Once people are infected, they infect other people very rapidly. So all the stuff about barriers to rats would only apply to the earliest stage of the plague. When it hit heavily populated areas, it became a person-to-person disease.
9
posted on
04/15/2002 11:49:53 AM PDT
by
firebrand
To: Gladwin
Whatever it was, it sure killed a lot of people and actually resulted in a significant reduction in the supply of able-bodied workers. The surviving peasants shamelessly exploited that dislocation by demanding and receiving a totally unjustifiable improvement in their standard of living at the direct expense of their employers.
To: Gladwin
I am a little curious what they think could be the Black Death, if it wasn't bubonic plague. I've got a book called "Diseases and History", a very interesting read, that suggests that the Black Death was actually two diseases working at once: the Bubonic plague, which is spread by rats, and Pneumonic Plague, which is spread by airborne droplets and was highly,highly contagious, which would correspond to the theory in this article, that "the researchers believe that the Black Death was transmitted through person-to-person contact, as are measles and smallpox.
The book I own is fairly old, so I don't know why the researchers in the article do not address Pneumonic Plague at all.
11
posted on
04/15/2002 11:51:31 AM PDT
by
wimpycat
To: firebrand
I didn't know that the bubonic plague could be spread person to person? I thought fleas were the vector? And that a flea had to bite an infected person, then bite another victim in order to spread the disease?
12
posted on
04/15/2002 11:52:21 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: Gladwin
Modern bubonic plague typically needs to reach a high frequency in the rat population before it spills over into the human community via the flea vector. Here in the US bubonic plague is endemic in the West due to prairie dog populations and their flea vectors. Don't these so-called scientists have anything better to do with our tax dollars than to spend their time trying to debunk accepted science.
13
posted on
04/15/2002 11:52:46 AM PDT
by
scholar
To: wimpycat
Yup, that makes a lot more sense.
14
posted on
04/15/2002 11:53:10 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: SpringheelJack
I don't know how far rats travel, or really much about the bubonic plague.
15
posted on
04/15/2002 11:53:39 AM PDT
by
Gladwin
To: wimpycat
Probably because they neglected to talk to anyone with actual infectious disease experience?
16
posted on
04/15/2002 11:54:27 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: wimpycat
Actually, both bubonic and pneumonic are the same organism, y. pestis. In the case of pneumonic, the patient has bubonic and some respiratory disease simultaneously, causing the cough droplets to be infected with y. pestis as well. The deadliest and most scary form of the disease is actually septicaemic plague. In that form, it infects the blood stream and few or no 'buboes' form. This was the form it took in patients who went to sleep healthy and never woke up.
To: Gladwin
"I am a little curious what they think could be the Black Death, if it wasn't bubonic plague. "
Before they are done, they might well try to prove that the people were infected with that fatal disease called Conservatism.
To: Gladwin
FWIW, two excellent books on infectious disease:
Evolution of Infectious Disease, by Paul Ewald; and The Coming Plague by Laurie Garrett. Garrett has another book out on public health issues that I haven't read, but it's supposed to be very informative.
19
posted on
04/15/2002 11:58:26 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: Black Agnes
That is a good link that you posted, and has a lot of real science.
20
posted on
04/15/2002 12:02:07 PM PDT
by
Gladwin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson