Posted on 04/14/2002 9:11:12 PM PDT by Pokey78
New evidence suggests that INS chief Doris Meissner knew that Elian's father was acting under duress. And that she tried to suppress it.
REPORTER ALFONSO CHARDY wrote an important but little-noticed article for last Wednesday's Miami Herald. It adds to the proofs that we never got the whole story behind the Clinton administration's case for deporting 6-year-old boat person Elian Gonzalez back to Fidel Castro's Cuba. Young Elian had fled the island on a rickety raft in November 1999, with a mother who drowned on the voyage.
On January 5, 2000, INS commissioner Doris Meissner ordered that Elian be sent back to his father and to Fidel Castro--an order that was enforced three months later when Attorney General Janet Reno sent shock troops with automatic weapons to spirit Elian from the Miami home where he had been staying with his uncles.
Meissner's main grounds were that Elian should be with his closest remaining relative, and in this she claimed to be arguing from precedent. "Family reunification," Meissner said, "has long been a cornerstone of both American immigration law and INS practice." Sure. But as we noted in The Weekly Standard at the time, unifying families has generally meant bringing them together in free societies, not repressive ones. No one ever suggested in the 1970s that we return refusenik relatives to Brezhnev's Russia, or in the 1980s that Sandinista opponents in Miami be sent to Nicaragua to be forcibly reunited with their persecuted families.
Meissner never addressed the evidence that Juan Miguel Gonzalez was acting under coercion when he requested his son be sent back to Cuba. If Chardy's story is correct, she may even have suppressed such evidence. An unrelated complaint by an INS agent brought to light a memo written by INS attorney Rebeca Sanchez-Roig on December 29, 1999--a week before Meissner made her decision to send Elian back. (The memo was unearthed by the Washington watchdog group Judicial Watch.) According to Sanchez-Roig, INS officials believed Elian's father was being monitored by the Cuban government when he made the angry calls to the United States demanding Elian's return. He also may have previously sought to immigrate to the United States.
The INS--i.e. Meissner, reporting to Reno, reporting to President Clinton--rejected out of hand Elian's standing to apply for political asylum (PA). But that was apparently not the advice Meissner received from Sanchez-Roig, who said that the U.S. government could "potentially accept the child's asylum's application and advise that there is no prohibition on age to child filing application. As such PA should proceed."
And that is far from the most infuriating revelation. According to Chardy, "Hand-scrawled notes at the bottom of the two-page memo said then-INS Commissioner Doris Meissner ordered the destruction of the memo one day after it was written when she learned of its existence. According to the notes, Meissner ordered that no more discussions related to Elian be committed to writing." Luckily for the cause of truth, someone at the INS had forwarded the e-mail out of the system by the time Meissner tried to sweep over her traces.
Reuters recently noted that Juan Miguel Gonzalez told Cuba's state-run newspaper Juventud Rebelde (Rebel Youth) that his son, when he grows up, "wants to be a policeman, a TV artist or an astronaut." The paper's censors must have thought the astronaut remark indicated that Elian is comfortable enough in Castro's Cuba to want to play a role in it someday. To our ears, it indicated a boy who would prefer to live in a country that has a space program.
Imagine that! A United States Senator is refused access to Andrews Air Force Base while Cuban "diplomats" were given free run of the place.
Imagine that! Cuban "diplomats" were given free run of the place where Air Force One and Marine One are hangared.
Talk about security risks!
-PJ
I believe the case went through the proper procedures BASED ON THE FACTS KNOWN at the time; that being said, if THIS information had been made public, the case may have taken quiet a different path.
.....investigated by no less than Christopher Caldwell, who I respect as a journalist....
Hmmmm.....January 29, 2000 by Christopher Caldwell
I do, too. It was a very difficult time, and that rat bastard Clinton saw it to be a divisive issue for conservatives, and played it for all it was worth. But screw the jerk, conservatives are bigger than one issue, and we won, and then, once the facts came out, reconciled. And that is what divides us from the Clintonistas. Democrats regard facts the way vampires regard garlic. But for conservatives, the facts are what bind us together. And that is why I believe we will eventually win...
One word - "is". Play games with that, and anything is possible.
Yur spelin be real gud too!
A correction to my previous statement - Play games with that, and anything is possible - except for the truth...
ALL for a reason...537 votes---Elian irrevocably changed the world!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.