o Fourth stereotype: that the opposition wants a coup d'état. ''Coup plotters use tanks and troops. They don't organize themselves to collect more than 2 million signatures for a petition asking for early elections,'' Jatar wrote. ``The true story is that despite having been elected, Chávez has broken the constitution and the law on many occasions.'' Chávez, who has stated that representative democracy ''is a farce,'' faces more than a dozen corruption and human rights accusations from the opposition in Venezuelan courts, including charges that he mismanaged millions of dollars from an economic stabilization fund and that his ''Bolivarian Circle'' militias were responsible for the killings of 19 people who were participating in an April 11 opposition march, she added.
Does this mean that we should support some opposition leaders' demands that Chávez resign immediately, or a coup d'état? I don't think so, and -- judging from what I heard from Jatar -- neither does she. Anything even closely resembling a coup would not only turn Chávez into a victim but would set a terrible precedent for Latin America's democracies. But Chávez critics have the right to demand -- within the law -- that their recently collected two million signatures be accepted as a legal step toward early elections. That's certainly more democratic than the attempt at a coup d'état Chávez led in 1992, his later glorification of that bloody uprising, or the gradual militarization of his government.***
Chavez repeatedly has said the only constitutional means of removing him from office is a binding plebiscite halfway through his term, or August. He was elected in 1998 and re-elected in 2000, and his term ends in 2007. Opponents accuse Chavez of running roughshod over democratic institutions and wrecking the economy with leftist policies. Venezuela's economy shrank 6 percent during the first nine months of 2002. Inflation has reached 30 percent, and unemployment 17 percent.***