Replies

At 9500 BC this region was temperate in climate.
Which comic book did you read that in?

Probably just got deeply confused on dating and such....

At one time, Antartica not only had a temperate climate, it had a TROPICAL climate; Antartica was on the Equator and has since drifted to the South Pole after the breakup of Pangaea and the further breakup of Gondwanaland. However, this was tens of millions of years ago. Hence, there's coal in Antartica.

While the climate of Antartica in 9500 BC may, of course, have been slightly different than today, Antartica was in the same place it was today, and it's a safe assumption that Antartica was then, as it is now: Ass-cold.

The whole polar flip-flop stuff is pure crap, of course.

Wish I'd seen this thread earlier; after I began reading it I was greatly fearful that NO ONE would figure out the entire story was a complete fake, but fortunately FR redeemed itself. Still, pretty embarassing how many posts there were till somebody did figure it out.

Geomagnetic Reversals and Polar relocations are not science fiction. They are accepted fact.

When there is a magnetic relocation, the magnetic pole thus changes. Our poles have been moving around all over the place. The last such displacement was 9500 BC.

Prior to the pole change in 9500 BC, the pole was in the Hudson Bay at 60 degrees north and 83 degrees west.

Prior to that, by a solid 43,000 years, the north pole was located in the Greenland Sea. It was at 73 degrees North, and 10 degrees East.

The above is well known. Check out any Geology textbook. Or, if you wish, use google and check out "Geomagnetic reversals."

What is not so well known or accepted is the belief that climate interacts with the strengh and location of the magnetic flux. I find this hard to believe, but Uniformalist Thinking is really a holdover from the days of Gradual Darwinism. How anyone can say that the "Northern Lights" are imaginary, or that historical variations in the climate is not tied to geomagnetic changes really have their head in the sand. The evidence is anything but that!

Befor the geomagnetic reversal to the Greenland sea, the pole was located in the Yukon at 63 degrees north and 135 degrees west.

The sudden appearance of civilization that is accepted by historians is only based upon their failure to take the translated writings that they have unearthed literally. How many "myths" of the Bible have turned out to be true? How many discoveries in the deserts and the oceans only validate what was once considered to be fictional accounts?

Historians like to believe that anything not directly verifiable as fiction. IF we believe this then we might as well believe that the entire ancient libraries and stone works were nothing more than "Romance Novels". Pure fiction for a superstious people.

Lets face it, they had technology that in many ways was quite advanced and they utlizied their forms of writing to record technical treatses on the world around them. Anyone who havn't understood this hasn't read the lost book of ENKI, the EPIC of Gilgamesh, the VIMAANIKA, the RAMAYANA, and the MAHABHARATA.

We know that biologically speaking our race as humans are 200,000 years old. If we make the assumption that from day one our ansestors recorded their history orally, then we can state that our human ansestors whitnessed over three geomagnetic reversals.

But, you may argue... they never said this. Oh no? The Egyption priests believed so, as did the Indians, and the Sumerians. How could they even know about this in the first place if they were just savages?

As far as the lower antarctica being in a temperate zone in 9500 BC that is easy to show. Consult any flora and fauna expert current with the historical variations in climate as a function of pollen count in rocks.