At a minimum, we'll have to rein in the diversity coordinators at certain IRS processing centers. Things may have gotten a little too diverse in some of them. |
Posted on 04/12/2002 10:40:19 PM PDT by Jean S
Wait why am I laughing?
Oh yea,because this is so f#^&+ing outrageous I can't belive it!
The Internal Revenue Service mistakenly paid out more than $30 million to tax filers seeking nonexistent slavery tax credits in 2000 and 2001, according to a Treasury Department investigation.
Mistakenly?
I thought that's what refunds are all about. You know, reparations to Tax Slaves? Granted the reparations ain't much but hey, the more slave you are the bigger that refund should be. Tax cuts for the rich,(the real slaves in the system):
Walter Williams, World Net Daily, 10-25-2000
According to the most recent U.S. Treasury Department figures, in 1997 the top 1 percent of income-earners (those with income of $250,000 and higher) paid 33 percent of all federal income taxes. The top 5 percent of income-earners ($108,000 and over) paid 52 percent, and the top 50 percent ($36,000 and over) paid 96 percent of income taxes. Guess what the bottom 50 percent of income earners paid?
But then I think it's time to change tax systems myself:
Keyes on Taxes & Government Spending:
- "The income tax in effect makes us vassals to the government – the politicians decide how much income we can keep. No mere “reform” of this slave tax, such as flattening the rate, can correct its fundamental denial of control over our own money. Only the abolition of the income tax itself will restore the basic American principle that our income is both our own money and our own private business - not the government's."
- "Replacing the income tax with a national sales tax would rejuvenate independence and responsibility in our citizens. True economic liberty and moral revival go hand in hand."
- "A national sales tax would also put the American citizen back in control of national fiscal policy. The best way to curtail government spending is to cut taxes, because they can’t spend what they don’t get. But with a sales tax, we could deny funds to a spendthrift government – and give ourselves a tax cut – whenever we make the private choice to alter our spending and saving habits."
Second, you mean all I had to do this year was pencil in $80k on line 33 and the check was in the mail.
Unf---king believable!!!!
I don't believe I'm off the mark to say that whites would never be offered such a pass--they'd be prosecuted for tax fraud.
At a minimum, we'll have to rein in the diversity coordinators at certain IRS processing centers. Things may have gotten a little too diverse in some of them. |
No doubt. And since when does a "regulated agency" declare penalties ? Who elected these MFs ?
(rhetorical BS)
Sorry. That credit only applies if your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather was picked on.
That could be applied to almost any U.S. Federal Government Agency.
I sure feel safer, knowing that a U.S. Federal Government Agency
is now in charge of airport security. < /sarcasm>
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
This is really ugly. I hope it is not a portent of things to come.