Kennedy assasination? Yawn! Old hat. I'm sure you've read and debunked "Case Closed : Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK" by Gerald Posner. The problem with you conspiracy theorists, I noticed, is that you never respond to the debunking of your theories or parts of your theories. It's not in your program. You got your catechism, your dogma and you won't budge, you won't adjust. You haven't looked at the Lennon assasination conspiracy, have you, and you won't. It's awfully uncomfortable to see your methods, your thinking patterns on display in a certifiable fool, is it? After reading these theories for years and years, I'm interested more in the form than in the content, and the form reveals to me more about the psychological state of the individuals who cling to this silliness and make it their life's passion, than about the sinister, invisible men supposedly behind all the evil in the world.
You were the one who suggested using the logical fallacies.
I agreed with you. Use them, on everything. Not just on Rivero, but also on official stories.
I can only conclude, sadly, that you do not in principle believe in logic if you are unwilling to apply it across the board.
I often run across people who espouse some commitment to some principle, but then it turns out that they do not actually believe in the principle they espouse. I guess I'll have to chalk you up as just another one of these many people.
By the way, I didn't say I was a conspiracy theorist. I just advocated you use logic, like you said people should!