Well, you're the JW defender here, so which is it going to be? We take ALL your words as truth, or just the ones you want us to?
So you believe that there is a "good reason" why Klayman DID NOT spend $23,000,000 on legal cases, the very thing he says he's in business for?
Is that the same as "I believe there is probably a good reason though" that Klayman didn't go by the rules of civil hearings and jumped ahead with a lawsuit in the Rameriz case, which was thrown out? (Which Larry most assuredly did NOT issue a press statement about.)
Having no inside knowledge of the internal affairs of Judicial Watch, it would not be fair or right for me to make that kind of speculation. Howlin, why don't you call them? Do you not, as you claim, want to know the truth?