So you were wrong in saying that this situation did not apply because Ashcroft was not in office yet--we both know he was. The truth is that your source in error was probably yourself, you most likely didn't even bother to check the facts before you stated that Ashcroft was not in office by April of 2001. You were just spreading more lies and disinformation about Judicial Watch, luckily, I caught your error.
I said I was wrong; you look ungracious with those last remarks.
You're in way over your head with your defense of JW. The only people that even care about JW are on this very site, and most of them have gotten the picture now. Someday you will, too; or, if you don't, you'll continue to encounter people like me who want the TRUTH, without spin and call JW what it is, a spin machine that twist facts to raise money.