Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kristol & Kagan: "Senior White House Aides:" Speak Up!
The Weekly Standard ^ | 04/11/2002 | William Kristol and Robert Kagan

Posted on 04/11/2002 6:45:41 PM PDT by Pokey78

The leak-proof White House is telling reporters--on background--that the administration is souring on Ariel Sharon. Who are these rogues?

YESTERDAY, in Madrid, the American Secretary of State virtually obliterated the distinction between terrorists and those fighting terrorists: "I think we are all in agreement and the world is in agreement that the solution will not be produced by terror or a response to terror." Quite a departure from the Bush Administration's response to September 11.

Later in the day, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer joined in the holiday from moral judgment. He said that the murderous suicide bomb attack in Haifa, in which eight Israelis were killed and a dozen others wounded, somehow underscored "the need for all parties to step back, for Israel to withdraw, and for the Palestinians and the Arabs to stop the violence, stop the killing." How wonderfully even-handed (even as it ignores the fact that the terrorist attacks against Israel have declined significantly since the Israeli military offensive began).

Administration officials speaking anonymously to reporters went further. "U.S. officials" told CNN White House correspondent John King Tuesday night that the ambush of Israeli military forces in the West Bank "would not have happened had Prime Minister Sharon heeded the president's advice and pulled back his troops." In other words, if Israelis die fighting terrorism, it is their fault for fighting back and for not heeding the American president's warning.

In fact, some senior White House officials seem to have launched a campaign against the national unity government of Ariel Sharon. The Washington Post quoted "administration sources" saying support for Sharon was "eroding . . . inside the White House." These "senior White House aides are beginning to express doubts about whether the Israeli leader can be a long-term partner in achieving the administration's goals in the Middle East."

These "senior White House aides" may be unaware that the current Israeli military operation has the overwhelming support of Israeli people across the political spectrum. But in any case, isn't it rather extraordinary, at a time when Secretary Powell is reaching out his hand to "Chairman" Arafat, that White House officials are now suggesting they would like to see the elected prime minister of Israel out of office?

Which leads to the question: Who are these "senior White House aides"? For months we've been reading about the unprecedented discipline of this White House--how no one speaks to the press without authorization. So we can safely assume that only the highest officials in the White House could be making statements with such significant policy implications. People at the level of, say, Andrew Card, Karl Rove, Karen Hughes, Condoleezza Rice, and Ari Fleischer.

Is it really the case that "regime change" in Israel is now administration policy? If not, these officials may want to publicly dispel the impression left by "senior White House aides."


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 last
To: Mike Fieschko
'And George the third ...'

Is scheduled to be the first president of the North American Union.

121 posted on 04/12/2002 1:08:08 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
All I said was that the alternative to the House of Saud is radical Islamic guys sympathetic to Osama bin Laden. Is that who you want controlling the Saudi Oil, and having all that money?

The Saud family IS symphatetic to bin Laden and other terrrists,and they already control all the Saudi oil and money.

122 posted on 04/12/2002 1:15:55 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AMG
but the more immediate concern is not letting Islamic fundamentalists come to power in Saudi Arabia in the first place.

They are ALREADY in power there.

123 posted on 04/12/2002 1:19:29 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: willyone
Bush will be a one term president. Get ready for Queen Hillary.

Yup.

124 posted on 04/12/2002 1:20:25 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #125 Removed by Moderator

To: AMG
No, the Saudi regime are pliant, pro-US puppets who pump our oil and refrain from building weapons of mass destruction.

And who finance and support fundie Islamic terrorist groups in other ways.

On the other hand, Islamic fundamentalists

They ARE Islamic fundies!

would build nukes that threaten both Israel and America and have leverage over Mideast oil supplies.

They have no interest in nuking America because they make too much money from us,and because we protect the Saud Royal family from the other Arabs. NONE of this means that THEY are OUR friends. This is a marriage of convenience on both sides.

126 posted on 04/12/2002 3:34:40 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

Comment #127 Removed by Moderator

To: AMG
. Unlike the Saudis, these Islamic revolutionaries do want to develop nukes against not only America but Israel as well. We can't let Sharon inflame the Mideast further which allow these nuke-crazy Islamic fundies get into power.

Now those are a couple of statements I can agree with. I would only add that we also can't allow people like Charles Schumer D-Tel Aviv and the other Israeli-Firsters in our own Congress and Senate fan these flames,either.

128 posted on 04/12/2002 6:31:45 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Texas Cornhusker
you neo-con Israel firsters are tiring.

As opposed to you neo-con Palestine firsters?

129 posted on 04/12/2002 6:35:32 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson