Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US force may monitor ceasefire in Middle East
Financial Times ^ | Harvey Morris in Jerusalem, Judy Dempsey in Madrid and Roula Khalaf in Amman

Posted on 04/11/2002 4:26:13 PM PDT by Henk

Colin Powell, the US secretary of state, embarks on a series of crucial meetings on Friday to end Middle East violence that could lead to the dispatch of a small US force to monitor a ceasefire, diplomats said on Thursday.

As the Israeli army pursued its two-week-old offensive with incursions into two more towns and a refugee camp near Nablus, Mr Powell again warned that the offensive would not end the conflict.

Israeli officials said more than 4,000 people had been detained in the offensive. Relief agencies said several thousand had been left homeless around the Jenin refugee camp, scene of some of the worst fighting between Palestinian gunmen and Israeli forces.

Mr Powell, speaking in Madrid before departing for Jordan and Israel on Thursday, said: "No matter how effective the Israeli defence forces believe they are right now in rooting out terrorism and going after other targets they have set themselves, when it's over there will still be people who are willing to resort to violence and terror."

Mr Powell refrained, however, from reiterating Washington's demands for Israel - so far rejected by Ariel Sharon, the Israeli prime minister - to begin an immediate withdrawal from the West Bank.

The two men spoke by telephone on Thursday and they are due to meet on Friday in Jerusalem. Mr Sharon said the army had pulled out of 22 West Bank villages.

However, troops went into the small towns of Bir Zeit and Dahariya and the refugee camp of Ein Beit Elma on Thursday. A number of students at Bir Zeit University, a strongly nationalist campus north of Ramallah, were among those arrested. The army said 121 of more than 4,000 Palestinians arrested in its two-week sweep through the main West Bank towns were on Israel's most-wanted list.

UNRWA, the United Nations relief agency, said 3,000 people were homeless around Jenin. The army continued to bar entry to the refugee camp there on Thursday.

With Mr Sharon apparently determined to continue the offensive in the face of US and world pressure, Mr Powell was expected to urge him to address underlying aspects of the conflict that would figure in peace talks, such as the future of Jewish settlements in the occupied territories and the fate of Palestinian refugees.

In his Friday meeting with Yassir Arafat - which Mr Sharon opposes but is unlikely to prevent - Mr Powell will urge the Palestinian Authority leader to issue a statement in Arabic to his people condemning terrorism.

While he will again urge Mr Arafat to crack down on terrorism, diplomats said the US recognises that the ability of the Palestinian security forces to act has been crippled by the offensive.

They said the issue of international observers to monitor a ceasefire, which the Palestinians favour but Israel has until now opposed, was bound to be raised.

Mr Sharon might be prepared to accept a small US-only force, but this in itself would be symbolic of international involvement in attempts to solve the conflict, diplomats said.

Gideon Saar, Israeli cabinet secretary, said on Thursday that Israel remained totally opposed to an international observer force.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
This is a very bad idea. We do not need to be in between these two.
1 posted on 04/11/2002 4:26:13 PM PDT by Henk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Henk
I totally agree-- I don't want one of our military personnel over there. Let someone else do it-- someone who won't represent quite such a bullseye.
2 posted on 04/11/2002 4:29:37 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henk
We could call them the Bullseye Brigade and paint targets on the back of their uniforms too. That idea is total insanity.
3 posted on 04/11/2002 4:29:40 PM PDT by Zorobabel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henk
Oh great, since the pali suicide bombers haven't gotten to America yet, we'll send some US soldiers in uniform over there to make it easy. Sheesh.
4 posted on 04/11/2002 4:31:32 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Exactly. Does the word "Beiruit" mean anything to Powell? Hopefully, this is a big load of Bravo Sierra, and JohnHuang2's editorial from this AM is the Real Deal.
5 posted on 04/11/2002 4:37:05 PM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Henk
NO!

No way, under no circumstances should we be any kind of monitors in that situation.

6 posted on 04/11/2002 4:41:10 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henk
"No matter how effective the Israeli defence forces believe they are right now in rooting out terrorism and going after other targets they have set themselves, when it's over there will still be people who are willing to resort to violence and terror."

So what? The same thing is doubtless true in Afghaninstan, the Phillipines, Pakistan, Iraq and everywhere else we are fighting terror. And no matter how many concessions Israel makes there will still be people who are willing to resort to violence and terror. What is it about the Middle-East that makes a smart guy like Colin Powell say such stupid things?

7 posted on 04/11/2002 4:43:19 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
I wholeheartedly agree. It may be that Powell knows his "mission" is doomed from the start so he can throw this bone out knowing nothing will come of it. Or, in your more succint phrase, it's all "bravo sierra."
8 posted on 04/11/2002 4:43:47 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Henk
Financial Times |
Harvey Morris in Jerusalem, Judy Dempsey in Madrid and Roula Khalaf in Amman

Yeah, this looks like a reliable source. I'm sure they have a direct pipeline to Washington.

9 posted on 04/11/2002 4:45:39 PM PDT by Cable225
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cable225
Hmmm. This is how bad things begin. First a small number of troops then more and more. Then an incident occurs. Talk about being in harms way. The Israel magnet is pulling everyone in it seems. We'll see if they go through with this or if this is just a trial balloon.
10 posted on 04/11/2002 4:52:19 PM PDT by Davea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Henk
"monitoring" means that you stand around and wait for someone to shoot at you.
11 posted on 04/11/2002 5:13:00 PM PDT by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henk
D**n straight. Who was the idiot who thought this one up? This is 180 degrees from the direction we should go in the Israel/Palestinean conflict: disengagment.
12 posted on 04/11/2002 5:30:42 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tom Bombadil
Personally, I've been there and done that. After a tour of duty as part of the Multinational Force and Observers put in place between Egypt and Israel on the Sinai, I would categorically reject ANY call for US "observers".

From a combat line soldier's point of view this mission looks like this:
1.Here you are in a hostile combat zone, forward of what would be considered the "Line of Departure" where you cannot identify your enemy from the civilians (because ALL of them are your enemy).
2. You are only given your organic squad weapons for defensive use - not even a heavy machine gun.
3. You have no ability to call for air or artillery support since you are there to "observe" as a stooge for the UN's global agenda.
4. Should you need support such as air or artillery, the HQ who must approve it is miles away and run by some General from another nation who doesn't give a damn if your troops live or not.
5. Any rapid reaction force that could save your ass is too far away to do anything but come and do the job of graves registration.

If you send in US troops, do so in Iraq or Syria or Iran. Do so as an invasion. Do so as to crush an enemy. Don't send our troops to be political pop-up targets for our self-avowed enemy!!

Only use our soldiers to defend this nation's interests - not the interests of the EU or the UN.

13 posted on 04/11/2002 6:06:07 PM PDT by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Henk
Pan-Islam's strategy is to tie USA and Israel as one target. It is stupid to fall for this trap.

There will be no peace, nor any residual cease-fire. Any Americans between Jews and the Paliban will be targets just like Jews. The Koran says so and ten year olds will make it so. The EU will blame American interventionism while Arab leaders continue to talk out of both sides of their mouths.

Israel should make war on terrorists and their accomplice nations so that arabs will remember this Passover War for the next 4,000 years.

15 posted on 04/11/2002 7:47:03 PM PDT by SevenDaysInMay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson