Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

District digs its heels in over home educators
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | April 10, 2002 | Diana Lynne

Posted on 04/10/2002 5:47:24 AM PDT by Free Fire Zone

District digs its heels in over home educators Family facing prosecution, jail over 'truancy' considers lawsuit

By Diana Lynne

© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

San Juan Unified School District officials show no sign of yielding in their truancy case against a home-schooling family and, to the contrary, are taking steps to crack down on all home-schooling. Joseph Tucker, the district coordinator of the Student Attendance Review Board plans to address the issue with state education officials next month, seeking to reform and clarify California compulsory education laws, according to the Sacramento Bee. A call to Tucker was not returned.

As WorldNetDaily reported last month, Tucker referred the case of Sandra and David Sorensen to the Sacramento County district attorney's office for prosecution. The Sorensens face up to one year in jail if found guilty of "contributing to the delinquency of a minor." To Tucker, who enforces state compulsory attendance laws, the Sorensen's 10-year-old son has been truant since January when the couple decided to home-school, formally withdrawing him from Carmichael Elementary School.

"It seems that once you enroll a child in the San Juan School District they think he's a possession for life," Sandra Sorensen told WorldNetDaily.

Sorensen claims her son, who suffers from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, was being harassed at school to the point of damaging his well-being. She cites an unusual policy of children giving suspensions to other children. Sorensen says her son began bringing home green cards apparently filled out by children and signed by a teacher and the principal in October. By December, the 10-year-old was coming home with numerous suspensions each day and, as a result, suffered a loss of self-esteem.

According to Sorensen, when she informed the school that she had decided to remove her son from the "unhealthy environment" and home-school, Carmichael principal Deborah Kraus made numerous threats in person and over the telephone to her over the decision. Kraus did not return calls seeking comment, and her assistant referred "questions regarding the Sorensen case" to Tucker. Sorensen sees Tucker's pursuit of the case, including his request for a copy of her "appropriate business license," Department of Justice fingerprint certification, and a copy of her Bachelors Degree and college transcripts as a continuation of the school's harassment.

"By law I'm required to fully and impartially investigate any complaints in regards to truancy and to verify whether or not if in fact the student is truant," Tucker maintains, and stated the requested documentation was to help him "ascertain that this is indeed a private school."

California education code does not address home-schooling and is considered by the state to be "unauthorized." The compulsory education law which dates back to 1874 requires "each person between 6 and 18 years of age to attend public full-time day school ... unless legally exempt." Carolyn Pirillo, a deputy general counsel in the state department of education lists the exemptions as attendance at a private, full-time day school, education via a credentialed tutor or independent study through the public school district.

Private schools are neither regulated nor monitored by the state, and are not required to comply with public school district standards. And because the education code doesn't specifically define what a private school is, many families have elected to set up private schools within their homes. The Sorensens have done just that, filing an affidavit, called the R-4, required by private schools with the state.

Tucker told the Sacramento Bee that receipt of the affidavit by the county is not an endorsement of a private school, and until the issue is sorted out, there can't be a gap in a student's enrollment in public school. The law does not require that private school instructors hold a teaching credential, but they must be "capable of teaching." Because the "wording is vague, the law is subject to debate," Tucker is quoted by the Bee as saying.

"They're going to try to get my R-4 annulled and then try to prosecute me. That's not fair. I've followed the letter of the law and they're bullying us," Sorensen complains.

"What the district is doing is embellishing [education code] to read into the statute what is not there ... to keep families from home schooling," says Will Rogers, an attorney retained by the California Homeschool Network for the Sorensens.

"An R-4 is only a registration document," Pirillo told WorldNetDaily, "Filing it doesn't transform the situation into a private school. A parent is not a private school."

Pirillo disagrees that the law is vague. "Teachers in the public school system and private tutors are required by law to hold teaching credentials. Tutors or parents without credentials can't declare themselves private schools to avoid the requirements. If everybody in the state said 'I'm a tutor without a credential so I'm a private school' then what would be the point in requiring a credential of a tutor?" Pirillo adds that case law dating back to 1953 shows the courts interpreting the legislation requiring tutors to be credentialed as "not meaningless." Pirillo cites People v. Turner and In re Shinn as two published appellate court rulings that reject the concept that parents may call their own home instruction program a "private school" in order to avoid the credential requirement.

As the San Juan Unified School district officials build their legal case against the Sorensens and seek law reform and clarification from the state, Sandra Sorensen asks "Why go to this length? Should I give in and give up my rights to see how my son gets educated because that's what they want?"

Carol Guardia, a former child welfare and attendance coordinator for Sacramento County insists district officials are merely looking out for the educational welfare of the students. "For every competent home-schooler out there, there are 300 who are not, using it for an excuse to keep their kids home," Guardia told WorldNetDaily. "There are hundreds of thousands that are 'home-schooling.' What would be involved in pulling these kids in? It would be a police state."

A "police state" is precisely what home-school advocates fear, and what the Sorensens feel they're getting a taste of. "I think at this point they're not going to stop until they get what they want," says Sandra Sorensen. "I hadn't considered a lawsuit against the school district. But now we're considering it."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: educationnews; homeschool; homeschoollist; sasu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: concerned about politics
Here's another source for assistance:

The Pacific Justice Institute is a non-profit 501(c)(3) legal defense organization specializing in the defense of religious freedom, parental rights, and other civil liberties.

P.O. Box 4366, Citrus Heights, CA 95611
Phone (916) 857-6900 Fax (916) 857-6902
www.pacificjustice.org

41 posted on 04/10/2002 9:04:34 AM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: erizona
Ping!
42 posted on 04/10/2002 9:06:16 AM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: Free Fire Zone;artist
"For every competent home-schooler out there, there are 300 who are not, using it for an excuse to keep their kids home," Guardia told WorldNetDaily.

Well, that's probably about right...

EXCEPT THE EXACT OPPOSITE!!!

This is a chilling story. I have bad words in my head. These monsters can't educate a Memorex cassette tape, but they want POSSESSION of our children. Curse them.

Dan

44 posted on 04/10/2002 9:14:36 AM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erizona
Please enlighten us as to what the heck that is supposed to mean?

That since I am well traveled, lived in may places and think this is a good place to live I am somehow off?

Look into the mirror, look deeply into the mirror...

knews hound

45 posted on 04/10/2002 9:16:44 AM PDT by knews_hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: knews_hound
"You are entitled to your opinion of course, but to think that problems such as this exist only in California is beyond stupidity."

You obviously have a reading comprehension problem. No one ever said the problems exist ONLY in California. The major problem with California vis-a-vis the rest of the states is that it ORIGINATES much of this bullbleep.

"I for one am increasingly disgusted with the constant put downs of our fine state."

Tough.

"If you dont like California, fine, dont live here, dont visit here, dont buy products from here and ignore us if you like."

We would LOVE to--but California doesn't keep its garbage within its own boundaries. See above comment about the cancer spreading to other places. Some Californicators get disgusted with their own mess, move to other states, and then start the same stuff ALL OVER AGAIN. Too stupid to learn from their mistakes, evidently.

"BUT SHUT UP !"

Simply put, no.

46 posted on 04/10/2002 9:19:58 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Free Fire Zone
For the record, and too all the California detractors out there.

My kids go to this very same school district.

My oldest is a JROTC Officer, straight A student and active in community and volenteer work.

If you insist on saying that ALL Public Schools are bad, you are really beyond having a conversation with.

Lumping everyone who goes to or is involved with public schools is stupidity, just like lumping every resident of a state.

Cheers,

knews hound

47 posted on 04/10/2002 9:21:17 AM PDT by knews_hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carolina
See, we homeschoolers contribute to the decline of public education.

Good. Now, if only something could come along to finish the job...

Tuor

48 posted on 04/10/2002 9:26:31 AM PDT by Tuor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
To put the blame on California for whacky ideas is a real strech.

Granted, we have our share, So...Washington DC, Connecticut, New Jersey, Ney York (City and State) Minnesota, Wisconson, Florida and all the rest of the left wing wacko states are simply following our lead.

Yeah, uh huh, thats it, a vast California conspiricy to turn the country in to Left-Bots.

Cheers,

knews hound

49 posted on 04/10/2002 9:33:02 AM PDT by knews_hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Free Fire Zone
An apropos quote from Adolph Hitler....”Let me control the textbooks and I will control the state. The state will take youth and give to youth it’s own education and it’s own upbringing. Your child belongs to us already, what are you?”

Sandra and David Sorensen are heroes!

50 posted on 04/10/2002 9:35:02 AM PDT by patriot_wes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Fire Zone
Every liberal is a thug.

Educrats march on homeschoolers.


51 posted on 04/10/2002 9:38:12 AM PDT by moyden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Fire Zone
If you have ever seen the California state constitution, which can be found on the web, it's a complete mess. One of the worst-written, most-meddled-with of all state constitutions. It has the look and feel of a document that's been repeatedly hacked away at by legislators, and has none of the elegant, grand design that many other state constitutions have.

Also, California is one of only a few states to have no Right to Keep and Bear Arms article in its state constitution, which should tell you something. (New York is another such state.)

52 posted on 04/10/2002 9:42:01 AM PDT by Jay W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
I am already a member of HSLDA. I just pulled down the paperwork to join CHN. I called CHN and asked them about this case in San Juan Unified School District. They report that the Disctrict is now saying that they are dropping the case. THAT DOES NOT MEAN THIS IS OVER. The Sorensen's attorney has not been notified of same, so this may be a ruse. KEEP THE PRESSURE ON THE DISTRICT STAFF. Let them know that this is going National.
53 posted on 04/10/2002 9:55:52 AM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
My older son's approach to math is logical and not PC. So he had no feelings about numbers and their outcome in mathematical problems/equations. His concern was doing the math correctly and getting the correct answers.

Your comments are very interesting. Our older son was 2 classes ahead of his younger brother. For the most part he was exposed and taught real math. His younger brother was exposed to the bs that you joke about in your reply.

We did not realize what was happening to our younger son. By the time we realized, he was in hs, hated math and did terrible if he had a real math teacher. He had to learn math the hard way in reality when he was graduated from high school. He is now good in basic math, but there is no thanks to the touchy feeling stuff that he got in Marin county and obviously later in Sacramento during his first 4-5 years of school. By then the damage had been done to him!

54 posted on 04/10/2002 9:58:25 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: Free Fire Zone
San Juan Unified School Collective

San Juan Central Party Commissars of Indoctrination

Email them here

56 posted on 04/10/2002 10:22:30 AM PDT by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave;concerned about politics
Parents: Watch out for 'Constructivist Math'

'Fuzzy' Math May Eventually Give Students the 'Blues'

57 posted on 04/10/2002 10:33:52 AM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta; wasp69; cantfindagoodscreenname; BallandPowder; wyopa; joathome; Momto2; RipeforTruth...
Ping!
58 posted on 04/10/2002 10:50:19 AM PDT by 2Jedismom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: knews_hound
If you dont like California, fine, dont live here, dont visit here, dont buy products from here and ignore us if you like.

BUT SHUT UP !

Hmmm...it seems by your rant that you can't afford to move out of state just now.

Signed
ex-Californian
glad to be gone and will bad mouth the state until the day it reverses course or until I die, whichever comes first.

59 posted on 04/10/2002 10:51:06 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom
Thanks; see my #44.
60 posted on 04/10/2002 10:54:32 AM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson