[nopardons]

Okay, that'll teach me to try to anwer two different replies, and meld them. Sorry about the 15 year old son remark ; however, the rest remains. You're still in school, haven't been a member of this site for even 3 months, and yet, you claim to know ALL about Larry Klayman. You don't !

You have accused ME of " group think " and implied GOD knows what else; but you , YOU claim to have all the answers. I take it all back, you aren't a naif, but I shan't tell you just what you are. You aren't worth the banning. LOL

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"You have accused ME of " group think " and implied GOD knows what else; but you , YOU claim to have all the answers. I take it all back, you aren't a naif, but I shan't tell you just what you are. You aren't worth the banning. LOL"

I do not particularily care what you think of me, although I have been called several colorful names by you tonight. I never knew that abuse could be so entertaining. I would much rather just debate you on the issues; my person is irrvelevant to this thread.

You also stated that most of the money that Judicial Watch brings in goes right into Larry's pocket. Before I believe any remark such as this, I would like to see some documented proof other than your interpretation of the financial situation at Judicial Watch. I consider slandering one's reputation a very serious matter. Do you?