Replies

" NAIF " is a perfectly good word, and I spelled it correctly ! If I had wanted to use the word " naive ", I would have done so. What's your problem, with perfectly good words, used correctly ?

So, you sent this thread to your 15 year old son, and that's supposed to impress me, and the rest of us ? That you are indoctrinating him, or that you're showing him both sides ?

Unless you have changed your nic, you are a very new newbie, and therefore, haven't enough information, concerning Larry, the ambulence chaser, to know what his history here is, nor why he is held in such disreput by most. Suffice it to say that any press release, by Judicial Watch, is now regarded as no news. Larry has not ever managed to win a suit. He whinged and whined about the candidate George W. Bush, and the brand new President Bush. I am not going to write a bok about all of this. Since you evidently hold Larry in such great esteme, and are soooooo interested in him, go read the FR archives. Enlighten yourself.

Gee, just HOW did you miss it, I did stay on topic and talk abut this thread's article. You just don't like what I posted. Now, please, dont attempt to change the topic. I am not the topic of this thread.

Well, I respectfully and vehemently disagree with you. I have followed Judicial Watch cases closely since I was in high school. One quick example was when Klayman subpoenaed Clinton fundraiser John Huang in 1996. It was because of Klayman's FOIA suits against the Commerce Department that we found out that the Clinton Administration was selling overseas trade missions to the highest bid for his presidential campaign chest. It was also the publicity that Klayman generated that sparked some tough congressional investigations into the Chinagate Scandal and Lippogate Scandals. In 1996, Klayman also forced fomer Clinton aide Harold Ickes to testify and got Pentagon spokesperson Ken Bacon to admit under oath that he leaked damaging information about Clinton whistleblower Linda Tripp, to the press. Because of Klayman's lawsuits and the revelations/facts that came from them, the government then fined John Huang $8 million in fines for campaign finance violations. John Huang will probably not commit these crony crimes again. Being cynical is always easy, but please, please, look at all the facts before arriving at so harsh a conclusion.

Judicial Watch is also prosecuting the $90 million class action lawsuit on behalf of those whose FBI files were stolen and misused by the Clinton White House. Judicial Watch also exposed this e-mail scandal in 2000, through the representation of Sheryl Hall, Betty Lambuth, among others. The court is considering whether to commence criminal contempt proceedings.

Besides, who do you think sparked the Chinagate scandal? It was Klayman's FOIA request to the Department of Commerce that sparked a congressional investigation into Lippo, etc. It was Klayman who uncovered the fact that the Clinton Administration was selling overseas trade missions to those who would contribute the most to his presidential campaign war chest.

"concerning Larry, the ambulence chaser,"

I think that you and I both know that Larry is not an "ambulence chaser." He is not a personal injury attorney, he is a public interest attorney with over 22 years of legal experience, including experience as a trial attorney, international attorney, and an attorney for for the Justice Department. You know, people usually sling mud when they have nothing else to go on and no proof to further validate their claims.

And by the way it is 'ambulance' and not 'ambulence.'