No, I'm saying Larry Klayman never tells the truth and twists words and what really happens in "issues" he's involved into to suit his agenda.
I've never depended on Larry Klayman for ANY news.....since I believe he only uses the words he wants to to further his cause, which, as everybody knows, is HIS future. If you have been taken in by him, that is your own fault.
You continue to ask all of us questions over and over; I, for one, believe you have fallen hook, line, and sinker for Larry's view of the "truth," which contrary to the number of times you post it, does't make it 1) true, and 2) proveable. You all are just like liberals -- you believe if you say it enough, it will be true.
And since you're always demanding the truth and accountability, can you tell me exactly why it is that Larry Klayman collected over $25,000,000 in 2000 and yet only spent just under $2,000,000 for "legal fees?" If the TRUTH, even as you see it, is so important, why isn't he paying MORE lawyers and court fees to find it?????
Howlin, we have heard you spat these facts out many times before and out of all the people in the forum to tell about Judicial Watch, BeAChooser is probably the last. Fact is, is that neither of us see a problem with JW's budget.
Never? I challenge you to list some lies that Klayman told in the press releases where Chinagate, Filegate, Emailgate, the Riady non-refund and the death of Ron Brown are concerned. Go ahead! If he NEVER tells the truth it should be easy.
I've never depended on Larry Klayman for ANY news
Of course, you won't tell us who you do rely on for news. I'm just curious if what you say is true how you learned about the Riady non-refund ... or did you make up your mind in that case without any facts? And how about Filegate? Where did you go to learn what Tripp said under oath ... or did you just miss her testimony? And most important of all ... what about Ron Brown? What source did you use to decide he wasn't murdered? At first you claimed it was Ken Starr ... but Starr had nothing to do with Brown. Then you latched onto the statement of a democRAT who said she believed the government's report that nothing foul happened. You said you believed that report too, although it is clear you never read it. And you just ignored the fact that the report was put out by the Clinton administration and failed to even mention dozens of highly incriminating facts. So, again, where did you learn enough about Brown to conclude he died by accident?
You continue to ask all of us questions over and over;
Which you never answer. It is curious how you can DEMAND that others answer your questions while blythly ignoring those of ours that you find "inconvenient".
I, for one, believe you have fallen hook, line, and sinker for Larry's view of the "truth," which contrary to the number of times you post it, does't make it 1) true, and 2) proveable.
Why are you afraid to exhume and autopsy Ron Brown's body? And what you are really doing is calling all those who testified UNDER OATH about Clinton/DNC illegalities (like Linda Tripp) liars. Now why would conservative do that?
You all are just like liberals
Oh that's a hoot. Would you like me to list the characteristics you have that are similar to democRATS?
And since you're always demanding the truth and accountability, can you tell me
See ... there you go DEMANDING an answer without answering a single question. No. Howlin, you address my question first ... what source did you use to decide Ron Brown wasn't murdered?