Creationism employs strategies outside the scientific method that do not unify to it, which, if implemented to facilitate technology, would probably not even have yet arrived at the abacus. Nor would nuclear weapons, or anything else work within such a framework. That's the neat thing about a true "theory", which is amenable to being adjsuted, tweaked or even discarded as information not previously realized is acquired.
Yes, for the most part, I think I do...absent any other disqualifying information...which even itself may be fundamental, as in matter, energy and the information that relates them.
You have more faith in the scientific method than a scientific appraisal of it would allow. We can't even unify the strong force with the weak force in a satisfactory fashion.
Creationism employs strategies outside the scientific method that do not unify to it,
By creationism do you mean a belief in a creator? Or are you refering to those who express doubt that all animal and vegetable life did not evolve from a single ancestor?
which, if implemented to facilitate technology, would probably not even have yet arrived at the abacus.
I'm not real sure about ancient Chinese cosmology but I suspect the inventor of the abacus had a world view based on some sort of creation story. He certainly was not an evolutionist.
Nor would nuclear weapons, or anything else work within such a framework.
Using the Theory of Relativity we were able to split the atom and unleash much energy. Can you cite me a comparable feat using the Theory of Evolution?
Yes, for the most part, I think I do...absent any other disqualifying information...which even itself may be fundamental, as in matter, energy and the information that relates them.
So, absent any disqualifying information you reject the premise of a slow, gradual evolution of life?
What a pile of dung! What great scientific achievements has evolution wrought? None at all. In fact, if science had followed Darwin we never would have discovered genes, we never would have discovered DNA, we never would have discovered the interrelationships within the human body because according to Darwinian theory there is no such things as genes, DNA or interrelationships within the body, they make evolution too impossible. A nice dumb theory that traits merge and are easily passed on from generation to generation is what evolution requires. Luckily for humanity, real scienitists did not listen to the charlatan Darwin.