Trite saying. Absence of proof is absence of proof for everything but absence of proof. Thus it is certainly no proof of evidence for your point which requires evidence known to be missing. Thus the patch job by Gould et al.
Trite saying. Absence of proof is absence of proof for everything but absence of proof. Thus it is certainly no proof of evidence for your point which requires evidence known to be missing. Thus the patch job by Gould et al.
How uterly silly. I make valid points that have nothing to do with Gould, but obviously you did not read it. I would be glad to talk about my post but you will have to actually read it and mature a bit before that is possible.
I find it very funny that Creationists love to talk about science when it comes to attempting to disprove evolution. But when faced with science questioning their view of creation, they run for the hills. Please answer my questions.