[medlarebil]

Why doesn't science use its analytical models, its computer simulations to take evolution to its logical next step and try to foretell what heaven is like. Or don't they believe in a kind of spiritual evolution? Perhaps they would be confronted with the questions they cannot answer: Why?

Science doesn't deal with belief or faith or figments of the imagination of ancient beings that have endured through the ages...until, that is, a theory based on scientific research and proofs emerged...it's called the theory of evolution and it deals in provable fact, not fiction

[lasereye]

it's called the theory of evolution and it deals in provable fact,

No it doesn't.

[WhiteyAppleseed]

I still say it is a hoot that science has always shown (to me anyway) the traits of the class clown proud of his latest prank: The scientist has usurped the high priests in the Holy of Holies and to date, his abuse of power has no novelty.

Ironic, too, that science argues so loudly for evolution while denying the logical conclusion of his theory: an evolution of the spirit that would answer the questions he cannot answer, like why.

And so as to give equal time before whatever election may be coming: The creationist is quick to deny any suggestion of evolution, yet vehemently announces the forth-coming and ultimate evolution, to a heaven that no one has seen.

The problem with science is that because of the coup, science believes his word is law. But....what about evolution?