[Valpal1]

We need to set the example for our children, families, friends and even Van Dam apologists.

You can set the example all you want, but the community doesn't have to follow. And forcing them to follow is called tyranny.

I don't like their lifestyle, I think Danielle would be alive today if her parent's were monogamous home body types.

But neither do I want rigid governmental control of social behavior. I don't think we'd end up with a kinder, gentler country, but more of the shallow PC groupthink that already mars our culture.

[Freedom2specul8]

That's what I was trying to bring up earlier.. Society already tolerates the lifestyle that is being attributed to the vd's. The reason it's not illegal is because you can't enforce it unless you put cameras in households and bedrooms. Do you think you can find a congress critter to actually sponsor a bill like that? It's too late to complain about it now. If ya'll want to make it illegal.. ie: swinging(which is still debateable since the judge wouldn't allow it in PH), bars, dancing in public, bring home friends etc., I would have to question whether that would be a wise thing. Think "slippery slope".