Too much here doesn't add up and the parent's gift of prevarication and omission clouds the issues even more. One of the original reports stated that the party broke up around 4, now we're to believe it ended at 2:15? What makes that so suspicious is that the reports not only came from the police but from BvD and DvD's own mouths.
There was something in the PH about others who heard the open invitation to the house. So because of the parents alleged propensities who knows what manner of people might have been inclined to see what was up.
Most people would like to see the PERPETRATOR found guilty. Make d*mn sure you've got the right guy before we start hooking up old sparky.
because they were made by boys dragging leakiy trash bags to the trash can placed there? I seriously doubt the drag marks are germane to the case. If the drag marks were from Danielle's body, would not the search dogs alerted on them, not to mention "the better trained FBI dog" (possibly a cadaver dog?). Just like the possible blood stains on the stairwell that the lead detective didn't know about. Maybe they tested negative, not blood, or not human blood, so no one bothered to tell him about this non-evidence. Stuff like that can be twisted at the PH for temporary effect, but it won't work at trial.
Granted, lots of stuff needs to come out, and the trial is the proper venue for that.