Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FresnoDA
um, FDA, in spite of your lurid red commentary, the article pretty much mirrors the PH testimony. So what are you talking about?
175 posted on 04/09/2002 8:37:12 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: Valpal1
This is important to note..

http://www.law.nyu.edu/foxe/fall01/torts/slides/torts_negligence092101.pdf THE NEGLIGENCE ISSUE DUTY BREACH CAUSATION- • The reasonable person does not normally expose others to unreasonable risks – therefore (?) what a reasonable person does is not negligent; we tolerate this conduct even if, by accident, it causes harm • But who is the reasonable person? – By what gauge do we measure?

Joe Citizen public tolerates dancing in public, infidelity, swinging, beer, liquor and bars. Joe Citizen sometimes tolerate pot, but the law we create does not in most instances. Joe Citizen tolerates bongs sold in certain kinds of stores that minors have access to just because. Joe Citizen tolerates speaking to neighbors in public. Joe Citizen tolerate ''sex games'' because we don't enforce antiquated sex laws. We tolerate our civil liberties and freedom because we do not dictatorship, and tyranny.

185 posted on 04/09/2002 8:47:19 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson