According to affidavit in support of the Pitches Motion(p1 ln 23) DW was at least part of the subject and assignments of a briefing of the SIU (at 4 am per PH testimony) on 2/4, before he returned from his trip. The officer says he was to locate, surveil and detain Mr. Westerfield., I'd say they were in a rush to locate him. JMO.
FBI was involved with missing posters for Danielle, and according to testimony one FBI agent assisted Detective Watkins with the computer search for porn.(as I recall)
Sara Muller Fraunces to lead new marketing effort
As part of the effort to more effectively position San Diego State for success, Sara Muller Fraunces has joined University Advancement as Associate Vice President of Marketing and Communications.
Fraunces will be in charge of the team that conducts media relations, publishes SDSU Magazine, Weekly and SDSU Insider, and performs a variety of other duties related to University marketing and communications. Her primary focus, however, will be on strategic planning, community relations and crisis management.
"We're delighted to have Sara's expertise now within the University," said Vice President for Advancement Theresa Mendoza. "She brings a new perspective to our effort to herald the strengths of SDSU and the contributions our faculty, students and alumni make to the region and beyond."
Fraunces comes to SDSU from a long tenure at San Diego's largest and best-known public relations agency, Stoorza, Ziegaus & Metzger, Inc. where she was senior vice president.
A recipient of numerous industry awards. active in community organizations, serving on several boards of directors and running marathons for charity.
Fraunces and the entire Marketing and Communications team is housed on the fourth floor of Centennial Hall.
Not in a rush to locate him, IMO. That is done with an APB. If DW was a hot tip, or the parents had strongly hinted at, much less blatantly pointed a finger at him, there would have been an APB, possibly a federal one. If you have a strong suspicion of a traveling MH with a possible kidnap victim, that might possibly cross state lines, you put out an APB. Not wait for them to return home after disposing of the victim.
The theory that DW was a prime suspect or fingered before the first interview does not fit, not in LE procedures, or LE behavior. Look how aggressive they got after first contact, when their suspicions were aroused. If their suspicions were aroused prior to that interview either from tipline info, or parental statements, where was that aggression then?