Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spectre
Please point out posts where I have name called.
103 posted on 04/09/2002 6:10:44 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Valpal1
Your post number 98, where one doesn't have to have an IQ above 50 to figure out who you were talking about. No, you didn't name anyone specific, you simply insulted the whole lot of us who dared differ with the van Dam fan club..

Throwing darts at people, then trying to back off of it, is acting like a coward. You wouldn't know anyone who fits that description, would you Val?

sw

105 posted on 04/09/2002 6:19:11 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: Valpal1; NatureGirl
Let's let people decide for themselves. Did they say what they said, or did they say what you imagined they should have said?

Officer: During the course of our investigation, the resident here, his name came up, as someone who had contact with the family. We've talked to him. He is cooperating with us. He's talked to us yesterday, he's talking to us today. We had some things we wanted to check in his house. He allowed us to go into his home and we are doing some things to process the scene and possibly eliminate him as a suspect." Source

Second, there was an article in the San Diego Union-Tribune the same day, where another officer says something quite similar:

"This is a process of elimination," said Dave Cohen, a spokesman for the San Diego Police Department. "We have gotten some information and we wanted to take a little closer look at his vehicle and his residence." Source

And from the motion filed in court last week:

"Detective Alldredge's affadavit was relied on to establish probable cause for search warrants 2783D and 27818 to search Mr. Westerfield's home. 27813 for Mr. Westerfields clothes. In his affadavit, Alldredge misrepresented statements by Brenda Van Dam that were relied on to supply probable cause for the issuance of the search warrants. Because the affadavits were sealed, documents may only disclose the specifics of the misrepresentations in camera."

So, from this, it appears Brenda said something, but that Alldredge might have altered it or exaggerated it. Bottom line, it looks like someone did point the police in a certain direction.

116 posted on 04/09/2002 7:23:13 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: Valpal1, spectre
As far as a bunch of stubborn people not needing to be on the jury .. That's almost comical --none of us, includingyou spectre need to be on the jury pool.
118 posted on 04/09/2002 7:25:12 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: Valpal1;spectre;MizSterious
To: spectre

Please point out posts where I have name called.

103 posted on 4/9/02 6:10 PM Pacific by Valpal1


YOU VAL HAVE A SERIOUS MEMORY DEFICIT DISORDER........OR DON'T YOU REMEMBER.....

While you FDA, are a salacious, bottom dwelling, crumb feeding, crab-eyed, soul shrunk, filth fantacist, shrieking HTML coding poster on FR.

39 posted on 3/19/02 7:23 PM Pacific by Valpal1


119 posted on 04/09/2002 7:25:27 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson