[sport]

.... Clinton's administration may have been greatly "investigated", but that means little, as none of the investigations turned up proof of actual indictable crimes, and in the U.S., you are innocent until proven guilty.

13 posted on 4/9/02 5:51 AM Pacific by chicago charlie

The proof was there,Ray just ignored it and weaseled around it.

From his own lips, Ray stated that hillary,"Gave factually untrue testimony".

That is perjury by any other name.

As for bill, Ray weaseled around indicing him by saying something to the effect of since he admitted giving untrue and misleading testimony [perjury to anyone else] all would be forgiven.

If any other Freepers can recall Ray's exact words, please feel free to chime in.

When bill and hillary too for that matter get to hell they will have apologists there already defending them to Satan.

The only thing worse than the clintons are their apologists and aiders and abetors, for without them they could not operate and corrupt anything and everything that they come into contact with.

[chicago charlie]

do you even understand the meaning of 'innocent until proven guilty? if the evidence was there, Ray should have prosecuted, otherwise, there is no guilt. that's the rule of law.

[Tymesup]

Ray was interviewed by Steve Malzberg a couple of weeks ago. When asked about the evidence in the Ford building, including info on Juanita Broaddrick, Ray said he was proud of the investigation, the highest executive wasn't above the law, New Jersey voters should focus on the economy (Ray is running for Senator), we should move on. Malzberg, after the commercial break, noted that the info would be unsealed in 2048, which is just around the corner.

Note to Mr. Ray - don't expect to receive my vote.