[CatoRenasci]

Your screen name gives you away - you hale from the home of corruption - Daley's Chicago, land of Jesse Jackson where corruption has been a way of life. Perhaps your standard is that if the evidence has been sufficiently well hidden or destroyed, there was no crime, but it is not history's.

It is not possible not to acknowledge that Clinton was a corrupt liar and still be considered a rational human being: those who defend Clinton fall into a very few categories (i) those who would tolerate anything, including rape, because he defends the feminist agenda or is the first "black president", (ii) those who personally profited from the corruption of his regime, (iii) those who do not believe in government of laws, not men, (iv) those who hate America and support our enemies or (v) the terminally stupid. Which category or categories cover you?

[chicago charlie]

I'm category (vi)- an American who understands the rule of law in my country. Investigation, innuendo, and indictment(or impeachment) do not guilt make. Proof and conviction do. That's the Law. and it goes both ways- if we want that rule extended to our side, we have to extend it to theirs.