To: Hajman
The commited illegal breaking and entering, which would be considered under 'and the like'. Which you have already admitted isn't even Maryland's statuatory language. However, even that thin disingenuous reed fails to stretch to accomodate your increasingly desperate reach.
Attempting to equate two police officers standing on your porch asking you to turn down your stereo as being "like" murder, rape, robbery, arson, or burglary; because they "broke your door" is an affront to reason. The jury would see you for exactly what you were.
268 posted on
04/08/2002 1:38:31 AM PDT by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
Which you have already admitted isn't even Maryland's statuatory language. However, even that thin disingenuous reed fails to stretch to accomodate your increasingly desperate reach.
Now you're outright lying. Better show evidence for this one.
Attempting to equate two police officers standing on your porch asking you to turn down your stereo as being "like" murder, rape, robbery, arson, or burglary; because they "broke your door" is an affront to reason. The jury would see you for exactly what you were.
Dude (or dudette), you need glasses. Actually read my posts, then comment on them. Comprehension doesn't seem to be your strong suit tonight. I said no such thing.
-The Hajman-
269 posted on
04/08/2002 1:41:48 AM PDT by
Hajman
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson