Unsupported and ridiculous. Still no quotes, naturally.
Unsupported? Don't you know what
innocent until proven guilty means? It means the burden of proof is on
you to prove him guilty. The supporting evidence that he didn't know who the police were is the lack of evidence that he knew who the police were when they came back. Also, the police acted in a manner consistent of a criminal breaking and entering. The man acted in a manner consistent of protecting his home against a criminal breaking and enterting (which is justifiable). However, for the supporting evidence that the man didn't know who they were:
- "'I thought I was protecting my home,' " Fisher quoted Zito as saying. " 'I didn't know they were police until I got outside.' "
Now, prove him wrong, or you don't have a case to stand on. BTW, 'rediculous' never proved anything. It would seem you're ignoring the small fact that the man claimed he didn't know who the police were, and there's no evidence to suggest otherwise.
-The Hajman-